Planning for People & Bikes, Not for Cars

"... if you live in a city that doesn't have good bike planning or infrastructure this film will equally inspire and depress you! ..."
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CANADA’S NATIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY AND FUND

Image
CANADA’S NATIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY AND FUND: CONVERSATIONS WITH THE ADVOCATES by  Nicole Roach  |  Dec 20, 2021  |  Transportation  |  0 comments Canada’s recently released (and first ever!)  National Active Transportation Strategy and accompanying Active Transportation Fund  was decades in the making, with strong advocacy efforts and government collaboration having taken place over this time frame. A few months ago, we wrote a blog post titled “ Canada’s Active Transportation Strategy and Fund: What it Means for Communities ” that outlined the content of the National Active Transportation Strategy and Fund and how it can be used. As we await the launch of the Fund, the team at GCC thought it would be worthwhile to reflect on the process to achieve this milestone and explore what the future holds for active transportation in Canada. We reached out to some of the key players within the Canadian active transportation community, in...
Read more

RUCK v MISSISSAUGA -- Appeal Hearing Synopsis

Image
Osgoode Hall, Toronto Lorraine Johnson, a stalwart advocate for the Urban Rewilding Movement in Ontario and Canada, attended today's Hearing at the Ontario Court of Appeal and provided this synopsis of developments ... For the evolving case of RUCK v MISSISSAUGA, check out the info at: https://wolfruck.com/causes/ruck-v-city-of-mississauga/ where developments are regularly posted. Lorraine Johnson p r n d t s e o S o h h 7 h a 9 0 h 6 u m a 7 f h 4 g 1 5 a 8 u l i c g g i i 9 2 2 9 m l 3 1 3 6 m 8 m g f 6 0 a 9 4 c    ·  A significant victory today in the legal effort to reform grass and weeds bylaws and to bring sanity to enforcement of these bylaws. Wolf Ruck of Mississauga was in the Ontario Court of Appeal today, arguing that Mississauga’s enforcement actions against his naturalized garden—including two complete mowings of his yard—were unjustified, arbitrary, and unfair under Administrative law. Because Wolf’s case raised Constitutional issues, the three appeal cour...
Read more

LAWN RAGE - a Case for Change

Image
In 1996, the Ontario Court of Justice ruled municipal Tall Grass and Weeds By-Laws to be void, invalid, unenforceable and in contravention of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees Freedom of Expression [Ref. Bell v. Toronto (City)]. Yet, the City of Mississauga Council "deems tall grass and weeds to be a public nuisance" and continues to enforce its Nuisance Weeds and Tall Grass Control By-Law 125-2017 on homeowner private property based solely on "Anonymous Neighbour Complaints". As Canada's 29th "Bee City”, Mississauga’s stated commitment “to support pollinators and their habitats” and advising homeowners that, "By planting pollinator friendly plants in your garden you can help enhance habitat for insects that pollinate wildflowers and food crops", is self-contradictory virtue signaling when the City's Enforcement Division cites homeowners under By-Law 125-2017 for the wildlife-friendly tall grass and weeds growing on ...
Read more