MISCHA’S GARDEN has been submitted to the Toronto Short Film Festival

MISCHA’S GARDEN has been submitted to the Toronto Short Film Festival which runs from March 16 to 21, 2027.
 
 
The film follows our cat, Mischa, as he wanders through his rewilded domain alive with pollinators, native plants, and wildlife. His feline observations contrast the quiet patience of nature—as observed, appreciated and respected by acclaimed Québec documentary filmmaker, Amélie Hardy, and cinematographer, Myriam Payette, who documented it in their award-winning film A WOLF IN THE SUBURBS—with the heedlessly destructive actions of Mississauga's By-law Enforcement authorities.
 
Emerging from the broader story behind the Ruck v. City of Mississauga constitutional victory (RUCK v MISSISSAUGA ONSC 73 - Background Summary Outcomes at https://wolfruck.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RUCK v MISSISSAUGA ONSC 73 - Background Summary Outcomes.pdf), MISCHA’S GARDEN is ultimately about grassroots resistance, resilience, and the power of witnessing.
 
Click to view the Trailer at https://youtu.be/RxD8DUjXqcI
 
 
filmfreeway.com
Toronto Short Film Festival
Since 2015, the Toronto Short Film Festival has showcased hundreds of short filmmakers to sold-out Toronto cinema audiences. We'll be back at the Paradise c...

 
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LAWN RAGE - a Case for Change

Image
In 1996, the Ontario Court of Justice ruled municipal Tall Grass and Weeds By-Laws to be void, invalid, unenforceable and in contravention of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees Freedom of Expression [Ref. Bell v. Toronto (City)]. Yet, the City of Mississauga Council "deems tall grass and weeds to be a public nuisance" and continues to enforce its Nuisance Weeds and Tall Grass Control By-Law 125-2017 on homeowner private property based solely on "Anonymous Neighbour Complaints". As Canada's 29th "Bee City”, Mississauga’s stated commitment “to support pollinators and their habitats” and advising homeowners that, "By planting pollinator friendly plants in your garden you can help enhance habitat for insects that pollinate wildflowers and food crops", is self-contradictory virtue signaling when the City's Enforcement Division cites homeowners under By-Law 125-2017 for the wildlife-friendly tall grass and weeds growing on ...
Read more

Ontario Court Finds Mississauga Lawn By-law Unconstitutional Under Charter

Image
On January 6, 2026, the Ontario Superior Court released its judgment following last summer’s hearing in Ruck v. City of Mississauga . The Court ruled that Mississauga’s Tall Grass and Nuisance Weeds By-law 125-2017 violates Freedom of Expression under the Canadian Charter , thereby recognizing that re-wilding and ecological stewardship on private property can be constitutionally protected activity. While the decision does not award damages or formally vindicate the City’s enforcement actions, it marks an important legal milestone for  the Urban Rewilding Movement and civic freedoms in Canada. A plain-language analysis and link to the full decision are available at: https://wolfruck.com/ontario-court-strikes-down-mississauga-lawn-by-law-as-unconstitutional/
Read more

RUCK v MISSISSAUGA -- Appeal Hearing Synopsis

Image
Osgoode Hall, Toronto Lorraine Johnson, a stalwart advocate for the Urban Rewilding Movement in Ontario and Canada, attended today's Hearing at the Ontario Court of Appeal and provided this synopsis of developments ... For the evolving case of RUCK v MISSISSAUGA, check out the info at: https://wolfruck.com/causes/ruck-v-city-of-mississauga/ where developments are regularly posted. Lorraine Johnson p r n d t s e o S o h h 7 h a 9 0 h 6 u m a 7 f h 4 g 1 5 a 8 u l i c g g i i 9 2 2 9 m l 3 1 3 6 m 8 m g f 6 0 a 9 4 c    ·  A significant victory today in the legal effort to reform grass and weeds bylaws and to bring sanity to enforcement of these bylaws. Wolf Ruck of Mississauga was in the Ontario Court of Appeal today, arguing that Mississauga’s enforcement actions against his naturalized garden—including two complete mowings of his yard—were unjustified, arbitrary, and unfair under Administrative law. Because Wolf’s case raised Constitutional issues, the three appeal cour...
Read more