Vandalism in the Park ???

Vandalism in the Park ??? ... Or a concerted effort by some self-anointed community gate-keeper(s) to censor information and stifle freedom of choice by the residents ??? ... Since this is about the tenth time the Petition posters have been ripped down in Orchard Heights, the latter scenario appears to be the more likely ... 🤔🧐😳🤨😥
https://www.change.org/p/petition-to-install-the-planned-approved-orchard-heights-park-foot-bike-bridge





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CCF Supports Legal Challenge Against City’s Destruction of Homeowner’s Garden

BRAMPTON — This morning, the Canadian Constitution Foundation will appear at Brampton Courthouse to intervene in the case of a Mississauga homeowner whose natural garden was repeatedly destroyed by City officials enforcing an aesthetic standards bylaw. Wolf Ruck is challenging the constitutionality of Mississauga’s Nuisance Weed and Tall Grass Control By-law , which prohibits grasses taller than 20 centimetres and certain plant species. Mr. Ruck argues his garden of pollinator plants, tall grasses, and untrimmed bushes is a reflection of his environmentalist beliefs, and the bylaw violates his section 2(b) Charter right to freedom of expression. The City has admitted the law infringes on this right but claims the breach is justified because long grass poses a risk to safety. The CCF aims to establish that the burden is on the City to prove the admitted violation is reasonable and justified under section 1 of the Charter , and in this case the City has faile...
Read more

LAWN RAGE - a Case for Change

Image
In 1996, the Ontario Court of Justice ruled municipal Tall Grass and Weeds By-Laws to be void, invalid, unenforceable and in contravention of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees Freedom of Expression [Ref. Bell v. Toronto (City)]. Yet, the City of Mississauga Council "deems tall grass and weeds to be a public nuisance" and continues to enforce its Nuisance Weeds and Tall Grass Control By-Law 125-2017 on homeowner private property based solely on "Anonymous Neighbour Complaints". As Canada's 29th "Bee City”, Mississauga’s stated commitment “to support pollinators and their habitats” and advising homeowners that, "By planting pollinator friendly plants in your garden you can help enhance habitat for insects that pollinate wildflowers and food crops", is self-contradictory virtue signaling when the City's Enforcement Division cites homeowners under By-Law 125-2017 for the wildlife-friendly tall grass and weeds growing on ...
Read more

Ontario Court Finds Mississauga Lawn By-law Unconstitutional Under Charter

Image
On January 6, 2026, the Ontario Superior Court released its judgment following last summer’s hearing in Ruck v. City of Mississauga . The Court ruled that Mississauga’s Tall Grass and Nuisance Weeds By-law 125-2017 violates Freedom of Expression under the Canadian Charter , thereby recognizing that re-wilding and ecological stewardship on private property can be constitutionally protected activity. While the decision does not award damages or formally vindicate the City’s enforcement actions, it marks an important legal milestone for  the Urban Rewilding Movement and civic freedoms in Canada. A plain-language analysis and link to the full decision are available at: https://wolfruck.com/ontario-court-strikes-down-mississauga-lawn-by-law-as-unconstitutional/
Read more